DYNAMICS OF PHOTOSYNTHETIC POTENTIAL IN CORN HYBRIDS OF DIFFERENT FAO GROUPS UNDER CONSTANT CROPPING AND PROTECTION SYSTEMS AGAINST SEGETAL VEGETATION

Keywords: corn, photosynthesis, segetals, hybrids, herbicides, plant protection, yield

Abstract

Purpose. To establish the photosynthetic potential of corn hybrids of different FAO groups and their relationship with grain yield under different protection systems against segetal vegetation in constant five-year crops. Methods. Field studies were conducted at the Institute of Climate-Oriented Agriculture of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine in the agroecological zone of the Southern Steppe of Ukraine (2021–2025, 46°38′24″ N lat. 32°36′52″ E long.). The studies used innovative hybrids of Ukrainian selection (FAO 190-430), which are listed in the State Register of Plant Varieties of Ukraine. The studies were conducted under drip surface irrigation with a pre-irrigation soil moisture level in the 0–50 cm layer of 75% RH. To protect plants from segetals, the herbicides Frontier® Optima and MaisTer® Power were used. Results. In the fifth year of continuous corn cultivation without the use of herbicides, the Leaf Area Index (LAI), on average across hybrids, decreased from 4.38 to 3.76. The late-ripening hybrids Tronka and Arabat (FAO 380 and FAO 430) responded most to weed infestation. Their leaf area index (LAI) decreased by 0.68 and 0.89, respectively, in the fifth year of continuous cropping, indicating a strong negative impact of segetal plants on this indicator. The early-ripening hybrids Stepovy and Khotyn responded less to weed infestation due to the shorter duration of the growing season, which reduced the period of regeneration and vegetation of soil reserves of segetals. The smallest difference in the Leaf Area Index in corn hybrids in the first and fifth year of constant crops was observed when using the combined action of soil and insurance herbicides (Frontier + Meister® Power), which indicates a minimal impact on the formation of the photosynthetic apparatus of segetal plants under such a protection system. The grain yield of Arabat (FAO 430) and Stepovy (FAO 190) hybrids increases with increasing leaf index (r = 0.732 and 0.896) with systematic protection from segetal vegetation, and without protection – the correlation in these hybrids becomes inverse (r = -0.512 and -0.781). The change in the direction of correlations indicates that segetal vegetation is not only a competitor for nutrients, but also significantly reduces the intensity of photosynthesis in the lower tiers of the leaf surface of corn hybrid plants shaded by weeds. Conclusions. To reveal the genotypic productivity potential of corn hybrids of different FAO groups during long-term continuous crops, it is important to minimize the impact of segetal vegetation on the formation and functioning of the photosynthetic apparatus of plants through the complex use of soil and post-emergence herbicides. The area of the active assimilation leaf apparatus and the duration of its functioning are a direct factor in the photosynthetic activity of corn hybrids and grain productivity. Integrated protection of corn crops with the use of soil and post-emergence herbicides allowed to ensure a sufficiently high constancy of the leaf area index and photosynthetic potential of hybrids of different FAO groups during the five-year period of continuous crops.

References

1. Sydiakina, O. V., & Hamula, Ye. A. (2025). Suchasnyi stan, problemy ta perspektyvy vyrobnytstva zerna kukurudzy [Current state, problems and prospects of corn grain production]. Tavriiskyi naukovyi visnyk. Seriia Silskohospodarski nauky, 144, 164–174. https://doi.org/10.32782/2226-0099.2025.144.22 [in Ukrainian].
2. Iakovyshyn, L. (2019). Top-5 skladovykh uspikhu vyroshchuvannia kukurudzy v monokulturi [Top 5 components of success in growing corn in monoculture]. SuperAgronom.com. URL: https://superagronom.com/articles/301-leonid-yakovishin-top-5-skladovih-uspihu-viroschuvannya-kukurudzi-v-monokulturi [in Ukrainian].
3. Skrypchenko, N. V., Dziuba, O. I., & Horbenko, N. Y. (2020). The estimation of soil fatigue in condition of longterm cultivation of woody fruit lianes. Scientific Bulletin of UNFU, 30(3), 36–40. https://doi.org/10.36930/40300306.
4. Donets, A., Marchenko, T., Lavrynenko, Yu., Piliarska, O., & Mishchenko, S. (2026). The impact of continuous maize cultivation on grain yield and agrophysical parameters of the arable soil layer. Ecological Engineering & Environmental Technology, 27(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.12912/27197050/214464.
5. Hlushchenko, L.D., Olepir, R.V., Len, O.I., Soroka, Yu.V., & Saidak, R.V. (2024). Corn for grain in continuous growing under different fertilizer systems and weather conditions. Land reclamation and water management, 1, 91-97. https://doi.org/10.31073/mivg202401-378.
6. Makukh, Ya. P., & Kozachenko, D. M. (2025). Vplyv sehetalnoi roslynnosti na formuvannia produktyvnosti kukurudzy ta yii strukturnykh elementiv [The influence of segetal vegetation on the formation of corn productivity and its structural elements]. Novitni ahrotekhnolohii, 13(3). https://doi.org/10.47414/na.13.3.2025.344969 [in Ukrainian].
7. Amons, S. (2023). Productivity of corn hybrids depends on growing technological methods. Agriculture and forestry, 28, 25–45. https://doi.org/10.37128/2707-5826-2023-1-3.
8. Ivashchenko O., Remenyuk S., & Ivashchenko O. (2018). Problemy potentsiinoi zasmichenosti gruntu v Ukraini. [Problems of potential soil contamination in Ukraine]. Visnyk ahrarnoi nauky, 8, 58–68. https://doi.org/10.31073/agrovisnyk201808-09 [in Ukrainian].
9. Tsyliuryk, O.I., Desiatnyk, L.M., & Berezovskyi, S.V. (2020). Zaburianenist ahrotsenoziv kukurudzy pid vplyvom obrobitku gruntu ta udobrennia v pivnichnomu Stepu Ukrainy [Pollution of corn agrocenoses under the influence of soil cultivation and fertilization in the northern Steppe of Ukraine]. Zernovi kultury, 4(1), 152–159. https://doi.org/10.31867/2523-4544/0119 [in Ukrainian].
10. Hrytsiuk, N.V., Dovbysh, L.L., Bakalova, A.V., & Puzniak, O.M. (2022). Zaburianenist korotkorotatsiinoi sivozminy zalezhno vid systemy udobrennia na dernovopidzolystykh gruntakh. Scientific Progress & Innovations, 1, 77–83. https://doi.org/0.31210/visnyk2022.01.09.
11. Mashchenko, Yu. V., & Sokolovska, I. M. (2023). Produktyvnist kukurudzy zalezhno vid yii chastky v sivozmini ta udobrennia [Corn productivity depending on its share in crop rotation and fertilization]. Ahrarni innovatsii, 21, 57–63. https://doi.org/10.32848/agrar.innov.2023.21.8 [in Ukrainian].
12. Rehman, A., Imran, M., Sajjad, M., Umair, R., Nawaz, S., & Ijaz, B. (2025). Evaluation of herbicide efficiency and their impact with reduced rates along with adjuvants at varying application time in maize (Zea mays L.). Journal of Agricultural Research (JAR), 63(1), 49–57. https://doi.org/10.58475/2025.63.1.137.
13. Ivaniv, M. O., Sydiakina, O. V., & Hamula, Ye. A. (2025). Formuvannia ploshchi lystkovoi poverkhni posiviv kukurudzy zalezhno vid ahrobiolohichnykh faktoriv v umovakh Pivnichnoho Stepu Ukrainy. [Formation of the leaf surface area of corn crops depending on agrobiological factors in the conditions of the Northern Steppe of Ukraine]. Tavriiskyi naukovyi visnyk. Seriia Silskohospodarski nauky, 145(1), 134–144. https://doi.org/10.32782/2226-0099.2025.145.1.16 [in Ukrainian].
14. Vozhehova, R.A., Lavrynenko, Yu.O., Marchenko, T.Iu., Piliarska, O.O., & Zabara P.P. (2021). Vplyv elementiv tekhnolohii vyroshchuvannia na ploshchu asymiliatsiinoi poverkhni posiviv linii – batkivskykh komponentiv hibrydiv kukurudzy v umovakh zroshennia [The influence of elements of cultivation technologies on the area of the assimilation surface of crops of lines – parental components of corn hybrids under irrigation conditions]. Visnyk ahrarnoi nauky, 12(825). https://doi.org/10.31073/agrovisnyk202112-07 [in Ukrainian].
15. Konopolskyi, O. P. (2025). Ploshcha lystkovoi poverkhni ta efektyvnist fotosyntetychnoho aparatu soi za riznykh system zakhystu vid burianiv v umovakh Lisostepu Ukrainy [Leaf surface area and efficiency of the photosynthetic apparatus of soybean under different weed protection systems in the conditions of the Forest-Steppe of Ukraine]. Novitni ahrotekhnolohii, 13(2). https://doi.org/10.47414/na.13.2.2025.348189 [in Ukrainian].
16. Zabolotna, A.V., Zabolotnyi, O.I., & Datsenko, A.A. (2021). Chysta produktyvnist fotosyntezu ta vrozhainist kukurudzy za umov vykorystannia herbitsydu Stellar [Net photosynthetic productivity and corn yield under conditions of use of Stellar herbicide]. Zroshuvane zemlerobstvo, 5, 29–33. https://doi.org/10.32848/0135-2369.2021.75.5 [in Ukrainian].
17. Skakun, V. M., Marchenko, T. Yu., & Zavalniuk, O. I. (2023). Osoblyvosti fotosyntetychnoi diialnosti linii– batkivskykh komponentiv hibrydiv kukurudzy zalezhno vid elementiv tekhnolohii [Peculiarities of photosynthetic activity of lines-parental components of corn hybrids depending on the elements of technology]. Zroshuvane zemlerobstvo, 79, 75–82. https://doi.org/10.32848/0135-2369.2023.79.10 [in Ukrainian].
18. Vozhehova, R.A. (2014). Metodyka polovykh i laboratornykh doslidzhen na zroshuvanykh zemliakh [Metodyka polovykh i laboratornykh doslidzhen na zroshuvanykh zemliakh]. Kherson : Hrin D.S., 286 [in Ukrainian].
19. Ushkarenko, V.O. (2014). Metodyka polovoho doslidu (Zroshuvane zemlerobstvo) [Field Experiment Methodology (Irrigated Agriculture)]. Kherson : Hrin D.S., 448 [in Ukrainian].
20. Derzhavnyi reiestr pestytsydiv i ahrokhimikativ dozvolenykh do vykorystannia v Ukraini. URL: https://eco.gov.ua/registers/perelik-pesticidiv-i-agrohimikativ-dozvolenihdlya-vikoristannya [in Ukrainian].
21. Vozhehova, R.A (2017). Innovatsiini tekhnolohii vyroshchuvannia kukurudzy na zroshuvanykh zemliakh pivdnia Ukrainy [Innovative technologies for growing corn on irrigated lands of southern Ukraine]. Kherson: Grin D.S., 720 [in Ukrainian].
22. Fedorchuk, M. I., Fedorchuk, V. H., Kovalenko, O.A., Tkachova, Ye. S., & Rozhok, O. F. (2020). Praktykum z fiziolohii roslyn: navchalnyi posibnyk [Plant Physiology Workshop: Study Guide]. Mykolaiv: MNAU, 200 [in Ukrainian].
23. Rudska, N. & Kolisnyk, O. (2025). Assessment of weed infestation of corn crops depending on herbicide protection in the Vinnytsia region. Agriculture and forestry, 39, 136–152. https://doi.org/10.37128/2707-5826-2025-4-12.
24. Stepanenko, M.V. (2023). Formuvannia ploshchi lystkovoi poverkhni kukurudzy zalezhno vid systemy udobrennia [Formation of the leaf surface area of corn depending on the fertilization system]. Zernovi kultury, 7(2), 300–306. https://doi.org/10.31867/2523-4544/0290 [in Ukrainian].
25. Huralchuk, Zh. Z., & Morderer, Ye. Yu. (2019). Problema rezystentnosti roslyn do herbitsydiv – inhibitoriv atsetolaktatsyntazy [The problem of plant resistance to herbicides – inhibitors of acetolactate synthase]. Factors of experimental evolution of organisms, 24, 296–301. https://doi.org/10.7124/FEEO.v24.1118 [in Ukrainian].
26. Shuvar, I. А., Korpita, H.M., & Hadzalo, O.J. (2025). Hlobalne poteplinnia yak chynnyk zrostannia invaziinosti sehetalnykh vydiv roslyn u Zakhidnomu Lisostepu [Global warming as a factor of growth of invasiveness of segetal plant species in the Western Forest-Steppe]. Visnyk ahrarnoi nauky, 7(868), 47–61. https://doi.org/10.31073/agrovisnyk202507-05 [in Ukrainian].
Published
2026-09-23
Section
MELIORATION, ARABLE FARMING, HORTICULTURE