Optimization of grafted tomato cultivation technology: the role of EM preparations in ensuring high graft-take percentage on Beaufort rootstock
Abstract
The article examines the potential of EM technology integration into commercial vegetable growing of hybrid tomatoes. Purpose. To evaluate the effectiveness of EM preparations (effective microorganisms) in grafted tomato plant cultivation technology and determine their impact on grafttake success rate on Beaufort Tm Cn VF1Fr rootstock. Additional objectives include establishing optimal parameters for preparing grafting components, elucidating the relationship between EM preparation concentration and application method with post-grafting physiological indicators, and determining the potential for integrating EM technologies into commercial hybrid tomato transplant production. Methods. Field trials were conducted during 2019–2021 at the Central Ukrainian National Technical University following the «Methodology of field experiments in vegetable and melon growing». The study utilized grafted tomato plants of Pink Delight F1 hybrid on Beaufort Tm Cn VF¹Fr rootstock. The research included three treatment variants: control without EM technology application, EM5 + EM Agro at standard concentration (1:100), and elevated concentration (1:50). EM preparations were applied by soaking rootstock and scion before grafting (10–15 min) followed by spraying plants in the healing chamber and substrate application. Grafting was performed using the tongue approach method with silicone clips 1,5–2,0 mm in diameter. Plants were placed in a chamber with controlled microclimate (temperature 24–26 °C, relative humidity 85–95 %, 60–70 % shading during the first three days). Over 14 days, graft-take percentage, callus formation rate, morphometric parameters, SPAD index, and frequency of physiological disorders were determined. Results. EM preparation application significantly increased grafted tomato plant survival: EM5 + EM Agro at 1:100 concentration achieved 94.8 % graft-take on day 14 post-grafting versus 82,5 % in control, while elevated concentration (1:50) reached 96,4 %. Callus formation accelerated by 2,4–3,1 days, decreasing from 9,2 days in control to 6,1–6,8 days in EM treated variants. Plant morphometric indicators on day 21 post-grafting improved substantially: height increased by 17,9–25,5 %, stem diameter by 16,7–22,9 %, and leaf surface area by 25,0–35,2 % compared to control. SPAD index in EM treated variants was 15,9–20,4 % higher, indicating better photosynthetic apparatus preservation. Wilting incidence decreased from 24,6 % to 5,2–8,4 %, tissue necrosis from 12,3 % to 1,5–3,1 %, and graft union failure from 5,2 % to 1,5–2,1 %. Economic analysis demonstrated high technology efficiency: standard transplant output increased by 14,9–16,8 %, providing additional profit of 1845–2085 UAH per 1000 grafted plants with return on additional investment of 613–1025 %. Findings. EM preparations are an effective tool for increasing grafted tomato plant survival on Beaufort Tm Cn VF1Fr rootstock. The optimal concentration for production conditions is EM5 + EM Agro 1:100, which ensures graft-take exceeding 94 %, accelerates healing by 2–3 days, and demonstrates the highest profitability (1025 %). The combination of Beaufort rootstock genetic advantages with the stimulating effect of EM preparations on the microbiome provides a synergistic effect manifested in high graft-take, improved morphometric and physiological plant parameters. The technology has significant potential for implementation in commercial tomato transplant production under protected cultivation conditions.
References
2. De Ruiter Seeds. Beaufort rootstock with control. Vegetables by Bayer. URL: https://www.vegetables.bayer.com (дата звернення: 01.12.2024).
3. Iriti M., Vitalini S., Scarafoni A., Pierce S., Castorina G. Soil application of effective microorganisms (EM) maintains leaf photosynthetic efficiency, increases seed yield and quality traits of bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) plants grown on different substrates. Plants. 2019. Vol. 8, no. 5. P. 1–14.
4. Morais M. C., Torres L. F., Kuramae E. E., de Andrade S. A. L. Plant grafting: Maximizing beneficial microbe-plant interactions. Trends in Microbiology. 2024. Vol. 32, no. 3. P. 252–263.
5. Li Y., Wang X., Chen J. et al. Effect of plant-derived microbial soil legacy in a grafting system – a turn for the better. Microbiome. 2024. Vol. 12. Article 228.
6. Lang K. M., Nair A., Litvin A. G. An alternative healing method for grafted tomato transplants: the effect of light exclusion and substrate temperature on plant survival and growth. HortTechnology. 2020. Vol. 30, no. 6. P. 677–687.
7. Ingram T. W. Vigorous rootstocks improve yields and increase fruit sizes of grafted tomatoes. Frontiers in Horticulture. 2022. DOI: 10.3389/fhort.2022.1091342
8. Turhan A., Ozmen N., Serbeci M. S., Seniz V. Effects of grafting on different rootstocks on tomato fruit yield and quality. Horticultural Science. 2011. Vol. 38, no. 4. P. 142–149. DOI: 10.17221/51/2011-HORTSCI
9. Rivard C. L., Louws F. J. et al. Grafting Tomato with Interspecific Rootstock to Manage Diseases Caused by Sclerotium rolfsii and Southern Root-Knot Nematode. Plant Disease. 2010. Vol. 94, no. 8. P. 1015–1021. DOI: 10.1094/PDIS-94-8-1015
10. Olle M. The Effect of Effective Microorganisms on the Performance of Tomato Transplants. Biology and Life Sciences Forum. 2022. Vol. 11, no. 1. Article 68. DOI: 10.3390/IECPS2021-12007
11. Saleh A. A., Elsheikh M. H. et al. New perspectives into the application of Effective Microorganism (EM) on phytopathogenic fungi: in-vitro antioxidant capacity, bioactive substances and fungicidal efficacy. Biotechnology & Biotechnological Equipment. 2024. Vol. 38, no. 1. DOI: 10.1080/13102818.2024.2387190
12. Msabila S. E., Nordey T., Ernest Z., Mlowe N., Manickam R., Ramasamy S., Huat J. Boosting Tomato Resilience in Tanzania: Grafting to Combat Bacterial Wilt and Abiotic Stress. Horticulturae. 2024. Vol. 10, no. 4. Article 338. DOI: 10.3390/horticulturae10040338
13. Black L. L. Grafting Tomatoes for Production in the Hot-Wet Season. AVRDC Publication no. 03-551. Taiwan : AVRDC – The World Vegetable Center, 2003. 3 p.
14. Guan W. Techniques for Tomato Grafting. HO-260-W. West Lafayette, IN : Purdue University Extension, 2019. 4 p.
15. Пігуль В. М., Дейнека В. І., Ващенко В. П. Методика польового досліду в овочівництві і баштанництві. Харків : Стиль-Іздат, 2018. 270 с.
16. Рожков А. О., Каленська С. М., Пузік Л. М. та ін. Дослідна справа в агрономії. Книга друга. Статистична обробка результатів агрономічних досліджень : навчальний посібник. Харків : Майдан, 2016. 298 с.
17. Ковальов М. М. Вплив параметрів кліматозабезпечення на вирощування мікрозелені в умовах плівкової теплиці. Таврійський науковий вісник. Серія: Сільськогосподарські науки. 2022. Вип. 126. С. 153–162. DOI: 10.32851/2226-0099.2022.126.21
18. Ковальов М. М. Вплив іонного складу поживного середовища на вирощування ремонтантних сортів полуниці в гідропонних колонах. Таврійський науковий вісник. Серія: Сільськогосподарські науки. 2020. Вип. 116. С. 104–111. DOI: 10.32851/2226-0099.2020.116.1.13

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.




